MLB News: MLB is “loathe to impose a season on players against their will”

New York Yankees fans continue to wait for the outcome of the MLB MLBPA (players union) negotiations to have some kind of baseball season this year.  With the latest news, we will continue to wait as the situation seems to get more contentious with each passing day.  The players union rejected the final offer from MLB and left it up to Commissioner Rob Manfred to impose a schedule.  He said there would be baseball 100% but now has suggested the season could be canceled. Ken Rosenthal and Evan Drellich of The Atlantic report:

“Sources told The Athletic that the commissioner’s office is loathe to impose a season on players against their will when the Players Association likely would counter such a move by filing a claim for financial damages. The league’s goal, according to one source, remains unchanged: To negotiate a resolution that is satisfactory to both parties.”

Five days ago on ESPN, Manfred was adamant that there would be a baseball season.  He said, “I can tell you unequivocally we are going to play Major League Baseball this year.” He put the chances then, at “100 percent.” But yesterday on the same program, he retreated from that statement and raised the possibility that the season would be canceled instead.

Upon hearing that the MLBPA executive director ex-Yankee Tony Clark had this to say:

“Players are disgusted that after Rob Manfred unequivocally told players and fans that there would 100 percent be a 2020 season, he has decided go to back on his word and is now threatening to cancel the entire season,” Clark said Monday. “This latest threat is just one more indication that Major League Baseball has been negotiating in bad faith since the beginning. This has always been about extracting additional pay cuts from players and this is just day and another bad-faith tactic in their ongoing campaign.”

MLB deputy commissioner Dan Halem in a seven-page letter to the players union listed a host of issues the league seeks the union’s approval on for a 2020 season, including on-field rules, scheduling details, start dates and the postseason player pool — issues laid out in the now-infamous March agreement between the parties. The letter noted that some unnamed 40-man roster players and staff have tested positive for COVID-19.

All of this posturing seems less like an effort to have a baseball season, but more of an attempt to prevent a players union grievance in case MLB implements a season or cancels it entirely. If a grievance is filed it would be mediated by an independent arbitrator.

On both sides of this dispute on getting a season going, both the owners are dug in on the players accepting more pay cuts and the players that they will not accept any further cuts in per gameplay.  It all centers around as pointed out in Halem’s letter; “it is clear to us that our dispute over the meaning of the March Agreement remains an impediment to resumption of play.”

At the time of the now-famous March Agreement, the players agreed to take a 50% pay cut as it appeared there would be a season that would be only half of the regular season in length. But at the same time, MLB made it clear to Tony Clark, and other player union executives that there would have to be further negotiations should the coronavirus situation change. However, it was not specified in the contract.

At the time of that contract, it was not known that a season of any length would be played with no fans in the stands, meaning no ticket revenue or concession sales for the owners of MLB’s 30 Pro teams.  Approximately a third of all owner revenue comes from those to revenue streams.  They need that money to pay players, which is the most significant expense for owners.

The owners (MLB) may be asking the players to share too much in those losses, but at the same time, the players are dug in and refuse to recognize that the owners will suffer more losses with each additional game played. That is where the negotiations stand, a stalemate that makes a season less likely with each passing day.

 

MLB News: MLB threatens to cancel the season, Is Commissioner Manfred a dumpster fire?

New York Yankees fans just want to watch some baseball in whatever form they offer.  But MLB and the players dropped the ball.  The two sides, extravagantly paid said they just couldn’t come to a compromise on how much each side of the negotiations would lose.  So who is the loser in all of this? My friends, it’s everybody!  The owners, the players, the fans, and yes, all of baseball.

All of baseball has a giant black eye that will not soon fade. So whose fault is it?  It’s surely not the fans that pay $65 for a seat and buy $8 hot dogs.  It’s not the fans that watch every game on TV and increase the Nielson ratings that bring in billions for owners and players alike. It’s the fault of the heavy hand of Commissioner Rob Manfred, and how he overplayed his hand, and the players who failed to compromise, some that earn more to play one three hour game than most Americans make in one year.

So who are the losers?  Everybody! The fans lose that love baseball and are suffering from the coronavirus scare, those that are unemployed, and all of us that are viewing political and racial unrest in the streets.  If as threatened, there is no season the players and the owners will lose more than they would have in any compromise.  And this writer loses.  As a writer, I want to write about that mammoth home run by Aaron Judge, or that fantastic stretch that Urshela made for the out, or that DJ LeMahieu always seems to get on base.  I don’t want to write about this crap, it sucks.

What few realize is the damage that is being done to a sport that is a perennial summer pastime.  The last super high Nielson ratings for MLB were in 1978.  The 2019 season was one of the least viewed in years.  So who is listening, surely not Rob Manfred or players union head Tony Clark?  Baseball as a sport is drifting away and nobody seems to care except the fans.  And, even the fans are disgusted and starting to turn away in droves.

All you have to do is view the Twitter and Instagram accounts.  According to who you read, fans are crucifying Rob Manfred and to a lesser degree the players and the union.

Ken Rosenthal of The Atlantic had this to say:

The players are going to get what they wanted most, 100 percent of their prorated salaries. Barring a last-minute surprise, they also will get a 2020 season that is too short for anyone who loves the sport, and less money than they could have earned if they had agreed to pay cuts in a greater number of games.

I do not blame the players for objecting to cuts or taking a stand in response to years of perceived slights by Major League Baseball and its clubs. If commissioner Rob Manfred imposes a season of 50-odd games, that decision will reflect poorly on him and his owners. But still it’s fair to wonder: Where exactly is the Players Association going with this?

Jess Passan of ESPN reported:

Major League Baseball commissioner Rob Manfred told ESPN on Monday that he is “not confident” there will be a 2020 baseball season and that “as long as there’s no dialogue” with the MLB Players Association, “that real risk is going to continue.”

Commissioner Rob Manfred said:

“It’s just a disaster for our game, absolutely no question about it. It shouldn’t be happening, and it’s important that we find a way to get past it and get the game back on the field for the benefit of our fans,” he said.

Players union head Tony Clark said:

“Players are disgusted that after Rob Manfred unequivocally told Players and fans that there would ‘100%’ be a 2020 season, he has decided to go back on his word and is now threatening to cancel the entire season. “This latest threat is just one more indication that Major League Baseball has been negotiating in bad faith since the beginning. This has always been about extracting additional pay cuts from Players and this is just another day and another bad faith tactic in their ongoing campaign.”

Meanwhile, New York Yankees fans sit back and have no clue if there will be a baseball season or not.  If social media means anything, all fans are beginning to care less and less as this dog and pony show goes on and on.  If MLB and MLBPA are listening, you need to get your act together and think of the fans for once and less about yourselves or you will have fewer and fewer fans and less and less pay and revenue than you are quibbling about now.

 

 

New York Yankees: Aaron Judge and others speak out on MLBPA video

New York Yankees, Aaron Judge

The New York Yankees slugger Aaron Judge is the first voice and the last voice you hear on a players union video that was released on CC Sabathia’s Twitter account.  The subject is not the baseball negotiations that are at a standstill, but the ongoing civil strife regarding race in America.

The video besides Judge features CC Sabathia, Aaron Hicks, Giancarlo Stanton, and the Mets Marcus Stroman as well as other MLB players. This is the first time that the MLBPA (players union) has commented on the Black Lives Matter movement.

 

MLB NEWS: Baseball has gone over the Cliff, Union refuses to negotiate

New York Yankees fans will see the shortest baseball season ever. MLB and the MLBPA (players union) have failed to negotiate a baseball season that will be shortened due to the coronavirus pandemic. Yesterday the union leader executive director, former Yankee Tony Clark, announced that they would no longer negotiate with the owners.  Baseball has gone off the cliff and will not get to explore what’s at the bottom of that cliff.

With the failure of the negotiations, it will lead Baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred to issue a back to work order and impose a baseball season more to the liking of the owners than the players.  The details of what that imposition will look like will most likely be issued soon as any season is slipping away.

In summary, back in early March, the owners and players agreed to a plan that would see players receive a 50% pro-rata pay cut based on an 82 game season. Although not in the contract agreement, the owners made it clear that further negotiations may be necessary as the coronavirus would determine what kind of 2020 baseball season could be had. According to the owners, when President Trump issued a national emergency, that contract became null and void.

The owners proposed several proposals to start a baseball season of different lengths and with different pay cuts to be suffered by the players and losses that would be endured by the owners due to no fans in the stands and no concession sales.  Little progress was made during over a month of MLB and MLBPA talks. MLB issued their latest and final offer to the players on Friday.  After a conference call with over 100 players, that final offer was rejected.

Ken Rosenthal and Evan Drellich of The Athletic reported additional comments by the players union:

“It unfortunately appears that further dialogue with the league would be futile,” MLBPA executive director Tony Clark said in a statement. “It’s time to get back to work. Tell us when and where.”

The league responded in a statement Saturday night: “We are disappointed that the MLBPA has chosen not to negotiate in good faith over resumption of play after MLB has made three successive proposals that would provide players, clubs and our fans with an amicable resolution to a very difficult situation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.”

“The MLBPA understands that the agreement reached on March 26 was premised on the parties’ mutual understanding that the players would be paid their full salaries only if play resumed in front of fans, and that another negotiation was to take place if clubs could not generate the billions of dollars of ticket revenue required to pay players,” the league said. “The MLBPA’s position that players are entitled to virtually all the revenue from a 2020 season played without fans is not fair to the thousands of other baseball employees that clubs and our office are supporting financially during this very difficult 2020 season. We will evaluate the Union’s refusal to adhere to the terms of the March agreement, and after consulting with ownership, determine the best course to bring baseball back to our fans.”

The March agreement between the parties empowers commissioner Rob Manfred to set the number of games as long as the league awards the players their full prorated salaries, with the caveat that the league makes its best effort to make the schedule as long as possible.

If Manfred does impose a season, the players will make their full pro-rata salaries for the number of games he decides upon, which is likely to be in the area of 50 games.   Whatever he decides, the union has given MLB until Monday night to provide the details.

The nation is enduring health issues and restrictions due to the coronavirus, has unrest in the streets, and 25% of workers unemployed. The lack of the two sides to come to a compromise and get a baseball season going for fans dedicated to the sport has created a big black eye on a sport that has seen a 14% decline in the past several years.

The ill will between the sides may very well rear it’s ugly head again, leading to a shortened 2022 season as well.  The present CBA (collective bargaining agreement) ends on December 21, 2021.  The players union believes that the owners have had the upper hand in the last CBA and is not likely to give up any gains it has gotten in past years.  With the present inability to reach an agreement, that contentiousness could continue into the next CBA and cause a baseball strike.

At some point, both the MLBPA and the owners have got to consider what is best for baseball as a sport and less about the billions in owner profits and player salaries.  If they don’t, the future of baseball will be in doubt as more and more fans turn away to other pastimes.

MLB: COVID-19 surges, MLB scolds Players Union for the stalemate, details

Yankees

New York Yankees fans are going to have to continue to wait for baseball of any kind. As the clock ticks away on a 2020 baseball season, the MLB representing the owners sent their latest and “final” proposal to the MLBPA (players union).  The proposal was included in a sharply worded five-page letter that didn’t address a new season until the third page of the letter. Most of the preceding pages blamed the players for the present stalemate in the “non-negotiations” to get a season started.

The new attempt to have baseball this year highlights the growing ill will between the parties.  The latest plan presented yesterday calls for a 72 game season ending at the normal end of September timeframe, with an expanded postseason of sixteen teams played in October.  The players would receive 70 percent of their prorated salaries for the regular season and up to 80 percent if the postseason is completed.

The plan will surely be rejected by the players union, as have all the previous plans.  The players continue to be steadfast in demanding 100% of their prorated salaries and not share in any of the losses the owners will endure due to no ticket sales and no concession revenues.  The stumbling block to a season is over money, but also in the differing interpretations of the original March agreement.

The March agreement was for players to receive 50% of their salaries based on a season of half as many games.  At the time of that agreement, the progress of the COVID-19 virus was unknown, as was the fact that fans would not be allowed in the stands.  The owners contend that the players are not entitled to any payment in the first place because Commissioner Rob Manfred had the authority to suspend all contracts once President Trump declared a national emergency on March 13.

At the time of the original agreement, MLB made it crystal clear to the union that the clubs would not be forced to resume play without fans because it would not be economically feasible. However, it was not stated in the agreement.

Though Friday’s proposal was not necessarily a final overall offer, it might well mark the last time MLB is willing to consider a season as long as 72 games. Each passing day potentially cuts into the length of the schedule, particularly given the owners’ insistence that the playoffs be completed on schedule, citing the potential for a second wave of COVID-19 in the fall and the reluctance of broadcast partners to reschedule their October postseason windows.

As was said earlier, if the players still insist on 100% of their prorated salaries and more games, this lastest proposal will like the others to be rejected.  They have until Sunday to give their answer.  If the players do not accept the proposal it may force Manfred to impose a season of the owners liking.  This could cause the union to file a grievance or chose to go on strike like they did in 1994.

Damage has already been done to the game of baseball as fans are turning away.  Both the owners and players must realize that further damage will be difficult to overcome, and no season will not be quickly be forgotten by fans.  The owners have compromised, the players refuse to, causing what can be called extreme ill will.  Even though the players will receive less pay per game under this latest plan, they will receive $300 million more in pay than if Manfred imposes a shorter season.

It’s been clear since the beginning of MLB negotiations that the coronavirus will dictate the season. In the past few weeks, the economy has partially reopened around the country.  Now 14 states have reported increased cases of the coronavirus, surging in some states. The question now is, will Manfred have the final word or will the coronavirus? Whichever the case baseball now has a great big black eye.

MLB News: MLB presents yet another plan today to the players union, details

The New York Yankees fans and all the fans of the “boys of summer” are beginning to wonder if the two sides in the negotiations will ever come together in time for an MLB season.  The MLBPA (players union) accepted a proposal to accept a 50% pay cut for an 82 game season back in March.  In further negotiations after the coronavirus caused the shutdown to last beyond the original delay and owners found out the games would be held with no fans in the stands, they have constantly wanted the players to share in the loss over the original agreement.

The back and forth has gone on for several weeks with no progress.  The owners want less regular-season games to cut their losses.  The players want more games to increase their pay.  The players have cited the risk involved playing during the coronavirus pandemic.  MLB has bent over backward to address health concerns.  They presented a 67-page health initiative addressing everything from how many can be in the dugout to the players having to shower in hotels.  The plan also covered the extensive daily testing all team personnel would undergo.

The health plan was mostly accepted by the union with more refinements to be made before play resumes.  That leaves money as the stumbling block. Recently the players demanded a 114 game season.  The owners rejected that and came back with a threat- like 40 game season with players having to take massive cuts in pay, as much as a 75% reduction for the highest-paid players.

The players then wanted an 89 game season while earning the full pro-rata pay.  Constantly the players have rejected all the owner’s attempts to get them to share in losses. Today the owners are making an olive branch offer for 70-75 games with players receiving 80% of their pro-rata salaries.  The plan also calls for an expanded postseason. MLB also outlined the elimination of direct draft-pick compensation for free agents tagged with qualifying offers; teams losing top free agents would get a compensatory draft pick, but those signing such free agents would not be penalized by having to give up a top pick.

Also in the proposal is that the players will get a share of the playoff pool in the postseason. This new proposal being presented today according to ESPN’s Karl Ravecho is the third such offer this week.  All back and forth, while baseball fans just want to watch some baseball.  But time is quickly running out to have a viable season.  If an agreement acceptable to both sides can’t be reached, Commission Rob Manfred will most likely impose a season of a certain number of games starting on a certain date.  At that point, the players can accept it and move on to getting spring training 2.0 going, or they can reject it and go on strike.  Could we see 1994 all over again?

With the present situation in the country, the virus, the unemployment, and the unrest caused by racial injustice and police use of force, it’s a very different situation than that of 1994.  The country needs sports now for a diversion more than ever before. Both MLB and MLBPA needs to think about the fans and reputation of the game.  Damage has already been done; no season will not be soon forgiven.

 

MLB Analysis: Why can’t the sides come together for a 2020 season? Explained here

While New York Yankees fans just want to watch some baseball this season, the MLB negotiations stalemate seems to make that less likely with each passing day.  The negotiations are in their fourth week, with little progress made.  Fans and this writer are starting to find it annoying when each plan and counterplan goes nowhere.

The newest MLB plan unveiled yesterday for a 76 game if not already rejected; it surely will be.  I’m not going to get into details, because they are boring. The owners want the players to earn less than originally agreed upon and the players headed by ex-Yankee Tony Clark want more dollars for a coronavirus shortened season.  With so many plans put forth and so many rejections, what is the underlying cause of the inability to reach a compromise?  It’s really pretty simple; neither side trusts each other.

To understand this fully, you have to look back to the 1970s and 1980s.  First, the owners wanted to institute a salary cap for players.  That was immediately rejected by the MLBPA (players union).  Many attempts since then have also been rejected. Even the most recent owner’s attempt for a revenue-sharing agreement.  The union saw that as a way to institute a salary cap and was proclaimed “dead on arrival.”

Back in 1980, the MLB owners were forced to pay $280 million to the union after the owners were found guilty of conspiring to avoid competitive bidding for players.  These are just two of the reasons that the players union is skeptical of the owners.  The fact that the owners now keep presenting the same deal worded differently over and over again isn’t building any new trust either as the players feel the owners aren’t acting in good faith.

There are parallels here to the negotiations during the 1994 season.  That ended up in the players going on strike that lasted into the 1995 season. Commissioner Rob Manfred has greatly underestimated players head, Tony Clark, thinking he could just steamroll the players.  If history proves anything its that will not happen.  Owners provide a venue, players provide the talent. Without the talent there is no baseball, and all sides lose.

As the seasonless days of baseball pass by, even the most optimistic reporters on the game are coming to the reality that there may be no baseball season this year.  If the sides can somehow form some trust in each other and reach a split down the middle compromise on money issues, there may still be baseball in 2020.  If that can’t happen, Manfred could use a heavy hand an put forth a 48 game season that the players must play.  Has neither side learned anything from 1994?

Although Manfred has the ultimate final say in what the MLB baseball season will look like, the players in the negotiations actually have the heavier hand.  A baseball strike is their option to not allow a deal, not to their liking from being shoved down their throats.  With each passing day, a 2020 baseball season becomes less likely.  It’s time for all of baseball to wakeup, smell the roses, and realize what the sport means to all of America in these troublesome times.  Take your losses now and hope American forgives you.

MLB News/Rumors: Is Baseball ready to drive off that cliff? It appears so

The baseball world went on hold almost three months ago, and New York Yankee fans and fans of all of MLB are still waiting to see the “boys of summer” play.  Other sports, NHL, NBA, and NFL, are all planning for getting their high contact sports going, but is the non-contact sport of baseball ready to drive off a cliff?  It appears so, were no lessons learned from 1994?

MLB and MLBPA (players union) and been in mudslinging mode for three weeks now with a resolution to issues seemingly not on the horizon, not to be anywhere near close. All this contentiousness while the baseball season is quickly slipping away.  A July 4th start of a shortened season now seems a thing of the past.  Yes, it’s about the coronavirus, but mostly it’s only about money.

Are these sides so blind that they don’t see the irreparable damage that will be done to their careers and the reputation of baseball?  Were no lessons learned when the 1994 season was canceled?  In the 1980s, baseball was America’s sport.  After lost revenues, lost fans, and a loss of respect for the sport, baseball never came back from that, and Football took over as the number one sport.  Just in the past few years, with all the young players entering the sport, the pastime was gaining a revival.  Are the players and owners going to let that hope disappear into oblivion?

For players, this will be a season they will never get back in their short playing careers.  MLB is not a sport you play into your sixties.  The average player career is 5.6 years, according to a study.  Yes, there are some that play for 15 or even 20 years but that is not the norm.  For these players, a loss of a season’s pay is nothing to be sneezed at; they will never get that back.

For owners, most will survive and live on to sell that $ 9 beer and hot dogs that can cost as much as $7, but the damage will already be done as fans become reluctant to pay $65 for that seat and the $15 parking fee to see a game they have lost respect for.  After 1994 and the canceled World Series, the fans never came back to past numbers.  A canceled 2020 season will not be easily forgotten by MLB fans. It could even put some teams in jeopardy.

No season is not going to benefit either side of the negotiations.  No one in the talks is acting in good faith.  Owners continue to make proposals they know the players won’t accept, players, refuse to budge on their demands.  At this point, both sides have to realize this is not 1994; it’s 2020 when fans have been quarantined for months from a dread virus, 41 million Americans are out of work, and there is unrest in the streets.  American needs baseball, and they need it now.

Jason Stark, the senior baseball writer for The Atlantic, recently wrote:

When you disappear off the face of the sporting earth for a year and a half, you’re just inviting people to go do something else, watch something else, care about something else. Many of those people never find their way back. Why should they? Why would they?

Baseball, are you listening?

EmpireSportsMedia.com’s Columnist William Parlee is a member of the Society for American Baseball Research.  Follow me on Twitter @parleewilliam.

 

 

 

MLB News: Players Union Rejects MLB owners plan, the follow up details

New York Yankees

New York Yankees and MLB fans everywhere continue to wait for a baseball season. Late last night, I reported on the breaking news of the MLBPA’s (players Union) rejection of the latest MLB owner’s proposal to start a baseball season.  This is the followup with all the details of that rejection.

For the past three weeks, different plans have been floated about to have a 2020 baseball season. Originally back in March, the players agreed to a 50% pay cut based on a season that would only play 82 games.  Basically a plan to pay by the game.  Health issues were mostly resolved by a 67-page health initiative detailing how players would be protected during a shortened season.  That left money as the primary stumbling block to getting a season started with the owners demanding more pay cuts. Thursday night the Players union had a conference call with 100 players.  The result is that the players are now more reinforced than ever on not taking any additional pay cuts.

“We want to play. We always have,” said Cardinals pitcher Andrew Miller, a member of the MLBPA’s eight-man executive subcommittee. “We also won’t lose sight of our principles and rights. Players are engaged like I’ve never seen before. Every day through this, each of those factors is reinforced. We hope to be on the field as soon as possible.”

The executive director of the MLBPA is ex-Yankee Tony Clark. Clark has been in constant negotiations with MLB and the owners to get a deal done that protects his players and with as few changes to the original March agreement as possible. Evan Drellich and Ken Rosenthal of The Atlantic were privy to the conference call and are responsible for the player quotations included herein.

“In this time of unprecedented suffering at home and abroad, players want nothing more than to get back to work and provide baseball fans with the game we all love,” MLBPA executive director Tony Clark said in a statement Thursday night. “But we cannot do this alone.

First, the owners wanted the players to take part in a revenue-sharing proposal that would reduced the owner’s losses due to having no fans in the stands and no concession sales.  The union saw this as a salary cap, which they have rejected since the 1970s.  This proposal was flatly rejected and was called by Clark as “dead on arrival.”  Since then, the owners have dropped that proposal, but requesting even further pay cuts that would see some of the highest-paid players taking a pay cut of as much as 75% with lesser paid players having their pay cut less.

The players rejected that by offering a plan that would allow them to be paid for a season of 114 games and go late into the fall.  The owners rejected that as they would lose even more money with a season that long. Almost as a threat, the owners came back with a proposal that would shorten the season to only 40-50 games with an expanded postseason.

“This threat came in response to an association proposal aimed at charting a path forward. Among other things, players proposed more games, two years of expanded playoffs, salary deferrals in the event of a 2020 playoff cancellation, and the exploration of additional jewel events and broadcast enhancements aimed at creatively bringing our players to the fans while simultaneously increasing the value of our product. Rather than engage, the league replied it will shorten the season unless Players agree to further salary reductions.”

“Earlier today we held a conference call of the association’s executive board and several other MLBPA player leaders,” Clark said. “The overwhelming consensus of the board is that players are ready to report, ready to get back on the field, and they are willing to do so under unprecedented conditions that could affect the health and safety of not just themselves, but their families as well. The league’s demand for additional concessions was resoundingly rejected.

During the constant back and forth, the players union was relatively divided into what MLB was trying to do to get some kind of season going.  All players, to a varying degree, were split in what concessions to accept.  But with the stalemate of the negotiations and their belief that MLB is not working in good faith for a fair plan to have a baseball season, they are now more united than ever in not accepting any more pay cuts.

“Important work remains to be done in order to safely resume the season. We stand ready to complete that work and look forward to getting back on the field, Clark said.”

One player’s agent said that the aggressive behavior of the owners has only provided more resolve by the players to take a firm position.

“If they want to unilaterally impose this bastard season, then so be it,” the agent said. “And that will be what’s expected. By doing that, they are galvanizing the union. The problem here is distrust. If this was a marriage, it would be a divorce. The union has been attacked. The players don’t like it. “I’ve never seen a negotiation like this in anything in my life. ‘Negotiation’ is a very generous term. It’s like a spit-wad contest.”

With this new resolve not to take any further pay cuts, it appears that the MLB owners are going to have to make the next move if there is to be a major league baseball season.  They are going to have to cry uncle and meet the player’s demands.  Some owners have already said they are okay with no season at all. Ultimately MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred and the coronavirus will decide how many games there are and when they will start and end.  As the clock ticks and each day passes it seems less likely there will be a 2020 baseball season.

 

New York Yankees: How the regular season will likely shake out for baseball

New York Yankees, Aaron Boone

As we wait for the MLBPA and team owners to resolve their negotiations regarding the financials of a potential regular season, things in the world are tumultuous. The New York Yankees are no exception to this reality, and while the MLB has rejected a potential 114-game regular season, there seems to be no resolution in sight. What could happen might stain history for the foreseeable future, not that it won’t already, but a significantly shortened season seems to be where we are headed.

A season in the 48-54 game range seems realistic at this point, as the two sides continue to argue over a fair salary for players. Minor leaguers across the country have been released and will not earn the remainder of their contract. Baseball was struggling before the latest pandemic, but it will take years for it to recover after the financial hit it has taken.

It is still possible that a regular-season won’t even happen, which would forgo the 2020 contracts for all players. The Yankees will be put in a tough spot as they’d be in line to lose multiple players without any evidence they can return from injury. Options like James Paxton will be tough to extend, having returned from surgery due to a cyst in his lower back, having no sample size to work off of might force the Yankees to let him walk in free agency. Then you have the J.A. Happ situation, where a player is earning $17.5 million but was retained due to his depth quality and Luis Severino missing the entire campaign due to Tommy John surgery.

Skipping over an entire regular season is something I never believed I would see in my lifetime, and most players would probably say the same. However, the financials are crucial, as playing without fans will hurt the overall income of the league, and players will have to settle for a lower price. Recent proposals would cut salaries like Gerrit Cole’s, from $36 million down to about $8 million, in favor of lower-income players.

If the two sides can conclude within the next few weeks, baseball could be up and running again by July, but at this point, it does not seem likely.